Table of Contents
File Transfer Protocol is an excellent method for transferring files between computers, especially over the cloud. WinSCP and FileZilla are the two most popular choices for this purpose. To determine which option is better, read our comprehensive comparison of WinSCP vs FileZilla, where we evaluate speed, specifications, and pricing.
List of WinSCP vs FileZilla
Regular file transfers require the best File Transfer Protocol (FTP) software to enhance productivity, security, and user experience. Our extensive comparison details each software’s unique capabilities, user interfaces, and features, providing insights into their pros and cons. This guide helps users make an informed decision when selecting an FTP platform. Let the comparison begin!
Read More: iCloud Private Relay vs VPN: Which is Better for You?
WinSCP vs. FileZilla Specs
WinSCP and FileZilla, both FTP software, share many features. Each also offers unique extras to meet consumer demands. Let’s look at the specifications of WinSCP vs. FileZilla to determine which suits your needs.
| WinSCP | FileZilla |
| Command lines interface | Tabbed User Interface |
| Scripting and task automation | Drag & Drop Support |
| Selectable user interfaces | Directory Comparison |
| Transfer queue /background transfers | HTTP/1.1, SOCKS5, and FTP-Proxy support |
| Connection tunneling | Network configuration wizard |
| File encryption | IPv6 support |
| Directory Caching | Keep-alive |
| Logging including XML Logging | Supports FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS), and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) |
| Administrative restrictions | Configurable transfer speed limits |
| Functions for working with file names and paths | Bookmarks |
| Binary and text transfer modes | Remote file search |
WinSCP vs. FileZilla Pricing
WinSCP and FileZilla are free to download and use, making them cost-effective FTP software options. You can access and download both from their official websites: WinSCP and FileZilla.
WinSCP vs. FileZilla Pros and Cons
Like any FTP software, WinSCP and FileZilla have their pros and cons. Below, we’ve listed a few notable advantages and disadvantages for each platform.
| Pros/Cons | WinSCP | FileZilla |
| Pros | The GUI (Graphic User Interface) from WinSCP is smooth. It makes batch file scripting and other operations pretty easy.It is free of cost.It has an integrated text editor that helps to open HTML, PHP, or CMS files. You can also integrate Notepad ++ or Eclipse.The synchronization functionality is automated which allows better data management.It is accessible in the Commander interface and Explorer interface. | The free version of this platform is promising. Although, you can achieve more if you go for the pro version.It is packed with some high-end features that are generally not available in other similar FTP platforms.It allows you to check how many files have been transferred and how many are remaining.The connection process on FileZilla is simple and effective.Can be accessed on multiple platforms like Windows, MacOS, Linux, |
| Cons | Compared to other platforms, it is a little slow.It does not support UNC paths.Limited to Windows | The specification and features on FileZilla are more complex in nature and thus, is not suitable for beginners. |
WinSCP vs. FileZilla Speed
FileZilla demonstrates significantly faster download speeds than WinSCP. While WinSCP can only achieve speeds of 5Mbps per file/session, FileZilla can reach up to 60Mbps. FileZilla completes the task in about an hour for large file transfers, such as downloading 300,000+ files totaling around 150GB, whereas WinSCP might take up to four hours for the same workload.
WinSCP vs FileZilla SFTP
WinSCP and FileZilla both excel in secure file transfer (SFTP). WinSCP supports public key authentication across SSH SCP, FTP, and SFTP protocols, along with Kerberos authentication, encrypted password retention, and SSH passwords. In contrast, FileZilla offers public key authentication and encrypted FTP through SSH.
Is FileZilla Faster than WinSCP?
FileZilla outperforms WinSCP in speed thanks to its quick and straightforward connection process. Users need to enter the host site, port name, username, and password, resulting in a connection within seconds. In comparison, WinSCP’s connection process is slower, and its file transmission speed also lags behind FileZilla’s.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which software is faster for file transfers?
FileZilla is significantly faster than WinSCP. It can reach up to 60Mbps per file/session, whereas WinSCP is limited to 5Mbps.
How do the connection processes compare?
FileZilla offers a quick and easy connection process, requiring just the host site, port name, username, and password to connect within seconds. WinSCP’s connection process is slower in comparison.
Are both programs free to use?
WinSCP and FileZilla are free to download and use from their official websites.
What security features does each program offer?
WinSCP supports public key authentication across SSH SCP, FTP, and SFTP protocols, along with Kerberos authentication, encrypted password retention, and SSH passwords. FileZilla provides public key authentication and encrypted FTP through SSH.
How do the programs handle large file transfers?
FileZilla handles large file transfers more efficiently, downloading 300,000+ files (totaling around 150GB) in about an hour. On the other hand, WinSCP may take up to four hours to complete the same task.
Which program should I choose?
Your choice depends on your specific needs. FileZilla is the better option if speed and a quick connection are priorities. If you need comprehensive security features, WinSCP might be more suitable.
Conclusion
Both FTP software, WinSCP and FileZilla, have distinct strengths. FileZilla excels in speed and ease of connection, making it ideal for users who prioritize fast file transfers and a streamlined setup process.
On the other hand, WinSCP offers robust security features, including support for multiple authentication methods and encrypted password retention, catering to those who prioritize security. Both programs are free, allowing users to choose based on their specific needs without a cost barrier.